Those that follow the Chipojoblog are familiar with one of our
core tenets: strive as best you can to design experiments under natural
conditions. This philosophy reflects my own view that behavior should be
studied in the field whenever possible. Our recent paper in Current Zoology, “Visual playback of colorfulsignals in the field supports sensory drive for signal detectability,” is a
prime of example of the power of this approach, in which an intimate
understanding of the ecology and behavior of anoles was used to test a major
prediction of the sensory drive hypothesis: are signals locally adapted? In
other words, are dewlaps locally adapted to effectively grab the attention of
an inattentive receiver?
Over the years we have published a series of papers supporting
the hypothesis that dewlap diversity can be partially explained by selection to
increase the probability of detection. However, until this paper, experimental
evidence from the field was missing, in part because manipulating dewlaps of
live anoles is not trivial. Furthermore, even if we were able to successfully
manipulate dewlaps, there are
still many other signals (e.g., body color, motion pattern, size and posture)
that would be out of our control. This problem was solved by researchers
working with acoustic signals a long time ago by figuring out ways to play the
signal of interest in isolation in what have become known as ‘playback
experiments.’ We stole a page from their book and constructed a remote-control
dewlap apparatus, which provided an opportunity to display only the dewlap under
natural conditions (see gizmo below).
Alex’s building and painting skills was key to the success of this
gizmo. He was able to construct dewlaps with similar reflective and transmission
properties of real dewlaps while taking into account the visual system of the
anoles (please see papers for details).
Control-remote dewlap display apparatus. A) Acrylic box within which electrical components were housed. B) Electrical components. C) The apparatus at a mesic site with a fake dewlap displayed. |
Besides presenting the dewlaps in the field, we wanted to test
the hypothesis that the dewlaps are locally adapted. Under this hypothesis,
increased detection in one habitat comes at the cost of decreased detection in
another habitat. This functional approach to test for adaptive value of a trait
is commonly used as robust evidence to support selection favoring the evolution
of the trait in question. In this paper we tested if the observed differences
in dewlap brightness between xeric and mesic populations of Anolis cristatellus is adaptive. If so,
dewlaps from mesic populations should be more detectable in mesic habitats and dewlaps from xeric
habitats should be more detectable in xeric habitats. Furthermore, detection
probability should decrease in the ‘wrong' habitat. Below are the results of
the experiments. In A. cristatellus individuals from xeric habitats have dewlaps which are darker, that is less brighter, than individuals from mesic populations.
Responses of free-ranging A. cristatellus to fake dewlaps that mimic the brightness properties of real dewlaps. |
Our findings support the sensory drive hypothesis and strongly
suggest that the brightness properties
of A. cristatellus
dewlaps are locally adapted via selection on signal detectability. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that a brighter signal is not always the most detectable or effective signal. A common misconception, which is partially the result of not including the sensory system and habitat conditions as part of the analysis. Studies addressing potential functions and selective forces promoting
the diversity of dewlaps found in anoles have flourished over the last decade, nevertheless, these
results are the best experimental evidence that we have to support the hypothesis
that diversity of dewlap colors might be partially explained by local adaptions
to habitat light conditions and the best smoking gun to support the idea that diversity of dewlap colors can be the result of local adaptations to habitat light conditions. Additionally, our study once again underlines the
need to measure both reflection and transmission when asking questions
regarding the potential function of the dewlap because the two combine to
determine dewlap coloration (brightness, coloration, etc.) in the real world.
No comments:
Post a Comment